The main disadvantages of using a CMS are:

[billal hossen]

A Look Back: From Static Sites to CMS
When the Internet was born, websites were simple “static” HTML pages , sometimes generated with individual-use tools such as Microsoft FrontPage.

A static page is like a file on your hard disk: when selected, it can be immediately opened with the appropriate software, which in the case of HTML files is the browser (Explorer, Firefox, Chrome for example).

A few years ago, CMS (Content Management Systems) became widespread , tools created to facilitate the management of content on large websites or those that require frequent updating even by those without technical programming skills.

The administration interface allows you to manage every belgium telegram data aspect of the website and allows for the dynamic generation of pages (dynamic therefore refers to the way in which the pages are generated, at the user's request; it does not concern the “dynamism” or animation of the contents themselves).

To date, the most popular CMS are Wordpress (which covers almost 50% of the market), Joomla and Drupal, all CMS created in the PHP language.

Server-side resources required for site publishing
page request response time
potential security issues
Furthermore, users often need to intervene rarely on the site and therefore do not achieve sufficient familiarity with the CMS, which in practice becomes a complex tool to use.

So do you really need a complex CMS, complete with MySQL database, for your website?

It depends on the goal, we already made this clear at the beginning.

We work daily with dynamic CMS-based websites.

For example, in the case of e-commerce sites or portals that require daily updates, it is advisable to use a CMS, which allows for more flexible and “autonomous” management of content.

But for most business sites, this isn't necessary.