The satisfaction of society's desires is guaranteed, to a certain extent, by the State's actions in providing public services, intervening in the economic and social domain, regularly exercising police powers and promoting activities of public and social interest.
All forms of State action, however, must be preceded by the necessary planning, from the identification of social needs to the strategies for its action, in order to guarantee greater legitimacy, efficiency and economy to the actions adopted and the effective allocation of public resources.
Planning, conceived as an instrument of the “temporal dimension” for long-term public management, is the necessary tool for aligning the economic behaviors intended by the State with the subjects of law existing in its territory, in order to make “the global activity of the various actors, aimed at the same ends, understandable” . [2]
In addition to providing transparency and consistency to state malaysia telegram data actions, planning aims at the coordinated rationalization of the options available for implementing fundamental policies and values of our Republic.
In fact, it is important to note that the activity of planning is mandatory for the State [3] and must be developed based on technical and economic diagnoses and prospective studies, in order to guide the choice of public policies to be implemented in a given space and time.
There is no way to implement a public policy and/or idealize the provision of a public service without proper strategic planning, not only to define the field of action of the State, but also, as mentioned above, the efficient allocation of public resources which, as we know, are finite.
Planning is nothing more than choosing priorities, evaluating the various options available and choosing the one that is most appropriate, economical, effective and efficient, and should be a constant, perennial and uninterrupted activity to be practiced in all activities under the State's responsibility.
However, despite the fact that planning activities are intrinsically linked to the management of public affairs, they are still, today, very precarious and trivialized, which means that the activities carried out by the State are not effective and efficient.
Planning as a guiding principle for public procurement
The legislator, being aware of the real difficulties related to the usual lack of preparation, programming, organization, coordination and strategy — even after more than 30 years of existence of art. 174 of the Federal Constitution —, found itself in the position of reinforcing planning as a guiding principle of the contracting system of the new law of bids and administrative contracts (LLCA, art. 5).
This was important to remind senior management of the agency or entity that planning any state action, and public procurement in particular, is of utmost importance to ensure the efficient allocation of scarce public resources [4] . After all, public managers should not only be concerned with implementing public policy or making public service provision viable, but also ensuring that such state actions are efficient and of high quality.