There is no centralized official authority

[[email protected]]

In order to ensure that recipients are really who they say they are, OpenPGP traditionally offers what is known as a web of trust . Users can simply distribute their public keys as identity certificates. that controls or manages the delegation of trust. Public keys must be reviewed by other users who confirm the association between the key and an individual.

– Independence

Any user can generate a self-signed key pair, and can distribute the public key directly. Since there is no centralized authority, a user can update the key expiration date and revoke the key pair… at any time. No third-party intervention is required.

– Total control

Since there is no middleman involved in the process cayman islands whatsapp number data 5 million of generating a key pair, updating it or managing it until its expiration or revocation date, the user has full control over his key pair. On the other hand, the user is free to upload his public key to a public key repository and/or distribute it directly to other users. Mailfence's Keystore also makes this really easy to do .

– Other uses



OpenPGP can also be used for other purposes not related to email, e.g. local encryption of documents, or as a signature format for digitally signing messages and software packages. The validity of OpenPGP signatures can be verified using the signer's public key.

Cons
– Public key distribution

There is no fixed platform for distributing OpenPGP public keys. This sometimes makes it difficult to share them with other users securely. Anyone can upload a fake public key to a Public Key Server (PKS), or steal someone's revocation certificate and then revoke the public key. There are also other problems associated with PKSs. This limits the options available to users .